There Never Was an “Ehrlich Surplus”
Saturday, November 3, 2007
A Year before Leaving
Office Ehrlich Demanded Extra Money be spent
On 2008
“Operations” Audio Recordings Reveal
Intent “The Governor has already put away that
additional money…for fiscal ’08
operations.”
Annapolis, MD – Under pressure from Maryland General Assembly Democrats to reserve a temporary surplus of cash for a Rainy Day, former Governor Robert Ehrlich insisted in 2006 - through his budget secretary – that he have unrestricted access to a temporary cash balance so he could cover the structural deficit facing state government in 2007 – ’08. Maryland Republicans have repeatedly and falsely claimed that Ehrlich left a surplus when he was voted out of office and that there was no structural deficit. In fact, the Ehrlich Administration knew there was a serious structural deficit and they wanted to spend the temporary cash balance to fill that growing gap.
Nearly a year before leaving office,
Ehrlich’s Budget Secretary Cecelia
Januszkiewicz made the point very clear before
the Senate Budget and Taxation
Committee:
Question from Sen. Ulysses Currie:
“…would you
not suggest we put away some additional
money?”
Answer from Budget Secretary Cecilia
Januszkiewicz: “The Governor has already put away that
additional money, put it in the Dedicated
Purposes Account. He put 670 million dollars
away to be used for fiscal ’08 operations which
we know we will need and you know we will need.
It’s not a surprise. It’s not a trick. We all
know we will need that money for next year's
operations."
Sen.
Currie:
“It’s my
understanding the Dedicated Purpose Account is
for specific functions, for a specific purpose,
a specific cause – here this money, we’re
putting this money into the Rainy Day Fund for,
to use in the General Fund?”
Secretary
Januszkiewicz:
“We’ve put the money in the Dedicated Purposes Account and we dedicated it to a specific purpose – fiscal ’08 operations. Uh, that’s the specific purpose it’s going to be used for.”
Two sound
bites from Ehrlich Budget
Secretary Cecilia Januszkiewicz
extracted from two hearings (February 2,
2006 and February 15, 2006) before the Senate
Budget and Tax Committee during the 2006
Legislative Session. In the two bites she
confirms Governor’s Ehrlich’s insistence to
dedicate the projected cash balance to cover
the structural deficit and “balance” the budget
for Fiscal 2007 –
’08.
Both pieces of testimony were recorded by committee staff and retrieved from legislative files. The entire testimony by the Budget Secretary in available upon request as is her written testimony and correspondence from February 2, 2006.
http://www.mddems.com/user/CJ.mp3
http://www.mddems.com/user/CJ2.mp3
“There never was a surplus because Bob
Ehrlich already spent it” said Quincey Gamble,
Executive Director of the Maryland Democratic
Party. “Instead of putting that money into a
savings account Ehrlich insisted that money be
put into a checking account to pay for the
structural deficit he never fixed. Those are
the facts despite what Bob Ehrlich and his
fellow Republicans have repeatedly
claimed.”
To
this day Ehrlich continues to mislead people by
claiming he left the state with a surplus and
without a structural deficit. A live interview
on WMAR-TV broadcast on November 1, 2007 – 2
days ago – reveals his intent to
deceive
WMAR-TV – ABC Channel 2 -
Thursday, November 1,
2007
News Anchor Brian
Wood: “Is it true that
when you left that we were in a
surplus?”
Robert Ehrlich: “Of course. In fact, we had a billion
dollar surplus and we had a billion four in the
Rainy Day Fund.
Brian Wood: “Did you know that that money was going
to go away quickly…that we were going to end up
in a projected deficit?”
Robert Ehrlich: “Well, that was a year ago. Of course
not. Of course not. In fact, thank you for your
good reporting by Mary Beth and all
that…”
“Deception exposed is never an attractive
spectacle. But now we have strong leadership in
Governor Martin O’Malley who, along with
President Mike Miller and Speaker Michael
Busch, is working openly and honestly to solve
the structural deficit for the future of
